Search for: "Arthur v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 61 - 80
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Ct. 2772, 2776 (2010) (Section 2 “places arbitration agreements on an equal footing with other contracts”) (citing Buckeye, 546 U.S. at 443) (Scalia, J.); Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
However, clerks in the major gay population centers of San Francisco and Los Angeles stopped issuing licenses on November 5. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am
City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, there were no fluctuating EIR project descriptions, nor was there a misleadingly minimized initial project description. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:40 am
City of Los Angeles, et al. (2d Dist., Div. 5, 2017) _____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 12:25 pm
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, 267; Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
City [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 3:21 pm
City of Los Angeles (2024) 104 Cal.App.5th 223, which can be found here, for a discussion of this issue as it relates to partially exempt projects.) [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 462-464, 475.) [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
’” (Citing Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 10:42 am
City of Los Angeles (2024) 98 Cal.App.5th 1087 (this blog’s 1/29/24 post on which can be found here), holding that it, too, was inapposite as it did not involve multiple NODs filed for the same entitlement, nor an administrative appeal of an approval to a final decisionmaker. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
City of Sunnyvale City Council (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 1351 and Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Los Angeles, 11-798, involves whether regulations implementing the Port of Los Angeles’s “Clean Trucks Program” are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administrative Authorization Act or, if you like living dangerously close to the edge of a Microsoft sticky-keys warning, the FAAAA. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 81 [holding “trial court has inherent power in mandamus action to remand a matter to an administrative agency for clarification of ambiguous findings”]; Keeler v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 81 [holding “trial court has inherent power in mandamus action to remand a matter to an administrative agency for clarification of ambiguous findings”]; Keeler v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 [City’s and RDA’s approval of detailed term sheet for 49ers stadium project was not project approval]; City of Santee v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
Taking Creed-21 up on its proposal, Walmart moved to compel Creed-21 to produce its PMQ, submitting to the court a recent hearing transcript from another Los Angeles Superior Court action in which Creed-21 was also represented by Briggs. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 3:26 pm
The opinion resulted from the second appeal in long-running litigation challenging approvals for the controversial Newhall Ranch development project in northwest Los Angeles County. [read post]
