Search for: "Arthur v. City of Los Angeles"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2017, 1:36 pm
City of Los Angeles (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 123, 130; Breneric Associates v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
City of Los Angeles (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 259, which focuses on whether an agency has discretion to require project changes that would mitigate environmental consequences an EIR might reveal. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:40 am
City of Los Angeles, et al. (2d Dist., Div. 5, 2017) _____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
City of Marina v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Noting that “[p]roject applicants are encouraged to develop comprehensive transportation management plans” (citing City of Hayward v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am
City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 193, 199.) [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
An Alberta judge has reserved her decision over who should pay legal costs in a successful defamation lawsuit by former journalist Arthur Kent against Canada’s largest newspaper chain, Postmedia. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385. 1400, and numerous other cases). [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
City of Los Angeles (2004) 126 Cal.App.4th 1180, 1197-1198.) [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
Reingold, MD Professor of Epidemiology University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Dharam V. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:57 am
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:56 am
City of Los Angeles (2015) 217 Cal.App.4th 1250, 1263.) [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 3:53 pm
City of Los Angeles (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 1385), or is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
Los Angeles Unified School Dist. (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 909.) [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Case No. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
City of Santa Clara (2011) 194 Cal.App.4th 1150 [City’s and RDA’s approval of detailed term sheet for 49ers stadium project was not project approval]; City of Santee v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412 (“Vineyard”). [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 4:54 pm
Real Estate Group v. [read post]
