Search for: "Associated Press v. United States Department of Defense" Results 61 - 80 of 550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was this nationalistic Hamiltonian mode that found its way into the United States Reports through Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion for the Court in McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Department of Public Health, Massachusetts began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in May 2004. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am by Ashley Gorski
Since its demise, data transfers to the United States have become more complicated, costly, and shrouded in legal uncertainty. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 12:38 pm by Drew Falkenstein
The Florida Department of Health, CDC, public health and regulatory officials in several other states, and the U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:57 pm by Hyemin Han
Army—with conspiracy and for the disclosure of the confidential health information of Americans associated with the United States government and military to Russia in connection with its war against Ukraine. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
”[12] Apparently, the people flown to Martha’s Vineyard were chosen on the basis of their wanting to relocate to Florida.[13] DeSantis stated that he funded the scheme using $12 million appropriated to the Florida Department of Transportation and that “he and his associates will continue to undertake similar transpor [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
” Cannon adds: “As a function of Plaintiff’s former position as President of the United States, the stigma associated with the subject seizure is in a league of its own. [read post]
§ 793, prohibits “willfully retain[ing]” information “relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation” and “fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it” (emphasis added). [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]