Search for: "Aton v. Aton" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2023, 1:03 pm by familoo
More recently again, in TF v DL v E&P [2022] EWFC 139, District Judge Webb dealt with a case involving a father diagnosed with a delusional disorder and a long history of vexatious applications and abusive correspondence against a backdrop of his belief the courts were corrupt. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:20 am by SHG
Those who do aren’t trying to force anyone else to participate, but the plaintiffs in United Poultry Concerns v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:45 pm by Gideon
In the other criminal justice opinion issued by SCOTUS today, a 6-3 court held in Graham v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I have defended detainees at the base since shortly after they arrived and was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 6:22 pm by Gideon
And now, this past week, comes the granddaddy of them all: State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 7:16 am by INFORRM
  It was The Sunday Times that established that local authorities cannot sue for libel – in the landmark Derbyshire v Times Newspapers decision. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
Article V The Constitution’s Article V allows for the founding document to be changed through the amendment process. [read post]
2 May 2016, 12:48 pm by Peter Margulies
Not unlike the critical moments of Ian McEwan’s novel Atonement, missteps and misunderstandings at several junctures paved the way for an unspeakable tragedy. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm by Jeff Gamso
” Postsentencing rehabilitation may also critically inform a sentencing judge’s overarching duty to “impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary” to comply with the sentencing purposes.Pepper doesn't deal with capital cases or efforts to atone or just do something because it's right. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Adolf Hitler is recognized by the court as “major offender” in sense of Art. 5 and his property will be subject to measures of atonement (Sühnemaßnähmen) foreseen in Art. 15(2) of the Act. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am by Hutko
Adolf Hitler is recognized by the court as “major offender” in sense of Art. 5 and his property will be subject to measures of atonement (Sühnemaßnähmen) foreseen in Art. 15(2) of the Act. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 6:06 am
Eisenhower's nefarious plan to enforce Brown v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:30 am
            We have not posted for a while—that day job can really get in the way sometimes—so we agreed to tackle the ridiculously long decision in Christiansen v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]