Search for: "Atwater v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
" Atwater Partners of Texas LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 9:40 am
Thus, claims in recent decisions, including those in Atwater v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
In Atwater v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:53 am
Since in the Lone Star State it would have been legal to arrest the driver over the burnt out bulb (after Atwater v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 12:08 pm
United States and Tennessee v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
This was after Eugene V. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:14 am
” Atwater v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 10:12 am
Logan (Florida State University - College of Law) has posted Reasonableness as a Rule: A Paean to Justice O'Connor's Dissent in Atwater v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 1:07 pm
Davenport Jr., county judge.Corsicana estimated the number of prisoners would be about 600 prisoners for 2,100 “jail days,” based on rough estimates of a four-month period this fiscal year.C misdemeanors are fine-only offenses, but the US Supreme Court in Atwater v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:29 pm
Justice Scalia cited Atwater v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
See Chimel, 395 U.S. at 763; see also Atwater v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:41 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981) with Belton's practically black-letter rule allowing the search of cars of arrested persons, and which, post-Gant, erodes police motivation to make pretextual car stops under Atwater v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
In practice, of course, police can't write a ticket without the identifying information, so this would give them cause to arrest you and cart you off to jail (under authority affirmed by the US Supreme Court in Atwater v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 9:47 pm
Reasons for judgement were released this week by the BC Supreme Court (Atwater v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
Co., 286 AD2d 679 [2001]), and the follow-up request was in proper form (see Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65-3.6 [b]; Doshi Diagnostic Imaging Servs. v State Farm Ins. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973), Justice O'Connor's dissent in Atwater v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 10:37 am
The US Supreme Court declared in 2001 in Atwater v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:38 am
" See Atwater v. [read post]
