Search for: "Autonomy, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2024, 12:18 pm by Allyson Smith
As a proud woman-owned company, State and Federal Communications, Inc. also works to celebrate and elevate women in the government relations industry and in our community. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 12:24 pm by Stephen Pitel
Two recent publications contain several topical articles: In the 2010 issue (volume 60) of the University of New Brunswick Law Journal are the following five articles: Catherine Walsh: “The Uses and Abuses of Party Autonomy in International Contracts”; Joshua Karton, “Party Autonomy and Choice of Law: Is International Arbitration Leading the Way or Marching to the Beat of its own Drummer? [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 9:09 am by Sarah Tran
Prior to law school, Andria worked as a Clinical Research Technician at RCTS Labs, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 5:24 am
The companies that have been sued to date are Amgen, Inc.; Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, L.P.; Bayer Corp.; Boehringer-Ingelheim Corp.; Eli Lilly, & Co.; GlaxoSmithKline, PLC; Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc.; Johnson & Johnson; Pfizer, Inc.; and Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Inc.Plaintiffs' claim in these cases is that the defendant erroneously classified pharmaceutical sales representatives as exempt from federal or state overtime requirements. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 6:25 am
The government, on the other hand, is not a fan.The California Court of Appeal in JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 7:24 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
This theme looks at the most common rhetorical arguments used to justify the development and implementation of AI inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 11:58 am by Adam Schwartz
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in In re Clearview AI, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Cohen, Freedom of Religion, Inc.: Whose Sovereignty? [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:41 am by Joy
As the Court of Appeal noted in Chapman v Chapman (2001), 2001 CanLII 24015 (ON CA), which remains the leading Ontario decision on grandparental access, the underlying assumption is that parental autonomy and deference is to be maintained, unless a parent behaves in a manner inconsistent with the best interest of the children. [read post]