Search for: "B&S v. Consumer Protection" Results 61 - 80 of 3,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2021, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Apr. 15, 2021) California’s AG sued Adir for violating state consumer protection laws based on conduct at its retail stores that allegedly exploited its mainly low-income, Spanish-speaking customer base. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 1:15 pm by Eileen McDermott
Consumer 2.0, Inc. d/b/a Rently has filed a petition with the U.S. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Doesn’t totally deal w/Lanham Act 43(a) claims, but it’s notable that your precedents on the false advertising side are California consumer protection claims. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:00 am by Bruce Nye
The statute would still be very protective of consumer rights. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:23 am by NRF Digital Team
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 5:41 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
A determination of the fairness of an indemnity policy in terms of section 48(2)(a) and (b) involves the application of the seminal test of Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 (5) SA 323 (CC). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:45 am
Before the Court is Disney's motion to dismiss Robinson's Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 3:27 am by Donald Dinnie
The claimant also argued that the indemnity falls within the provisions of sections 48(2)(a) and (b) of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) and its terms were unfair, unreasonable or unjust and that the defendant had not complied with sections 49(2) and 58(1) of the CPA>. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:19 am by Steven Hansen
The Senate version is apparently titled the "Consumer Product Safety Flexibility Act of 2011" and we think is under number S. 1448. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:55 am
ConsumerAffairs is a website that hosts third-party consumer reviews of various products and services, including Nemet's. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 4:39 am
The Court held: The Consumer Fraud Act is intended to protect consumers from deception and fraud, even when committed in good faith. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:00 am by Andrew B. Lustigman
Supreme Court fights concerning consumer protection, namely, the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) ability to seek monetary restitution for bad marketplace behavior under Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Rich Vetstein
An Act Regulating Notaries Public to Protect Consumers And The Validity And Effectiveness Of Recorded Instruments On October 6, 2016 Governor Charlie Baker signed Chapter 289 of the Acts of 2016, An Act Regulating Notaries Public to Protect Consumers And The Validity And Effectiveness Of Recorded Instruments. [read post]