Search for: "B&W, et al v. ANI, et al of: B&W - No. (Granted)" Results 61 - 80 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2018, 4:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, any enforcement actions against the perpetrators of the EDGAR hack would fall squarely within the recently chartered territory of outsider trading. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am by Jeff Welty
See, e.g., Sara Sun Beale, et al., Grand Jury Law and Practice § 1:8 (2d ed. 2017 update) (stating that “[a] presentment . . . is brought on the grand jurors’ own initiative, based on facts already known to them or discovered by their investigation”); Renne B. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:24 pm by Eric Caligiuri
§1400(b), to allow plaintiffs to bring a patent infringement case against a domestic corporation in any district court where there is personal jurisdiction over that corporate defendant. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:42 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
§ 1328(a)(2): [T]he court shall grant the debtor a discharge of all debts provided for by the plan or disallowed under section 502 of this title, except any debt— . . . (2) of the kind specified in section 507(a)(8)(C) or in paragraph (1)(B), (1)(C), (2), (3), (4), (5), (8), or (9) of section 523(a). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   For example, in 2016, a Minnesota federal judge granted motions to dismiss filed by Target Corporation’s executives, directors and the board of director’s special litigation committee after the special litigation committee issued a 91-page report concluding that Target should not pursue derivative claims against officers and directors based on the company’s 2013 cyber breach incident,[7] which affected approximately 110 million Target customers.[8]  Had… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
   For example, in 2016, a Minnesota federal judge granted motions to dismiss filed by Target Corporation’s executives, directors and the board of director’s special litigation committee after the special litigation committee issued a 91-page report concluding that Target should not pursue derivative claims against officers and directors based on the company’s 2013 cyber breach incident,[7] which affected approximately 110 million Target customers.[8]  Had… [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm by Wolfgang Demino
FORRESTER WINNE, et al., Plaintiffs,v.NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-1, et al., Defendants.No. 1:16-cv-00229-JDL.United States District Court, D. [read post]