Search for: "BAKER v. LITTLE"
Results 61 - 80
of 674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm
(Hat tip: H-Law) Marc Lender discusses his book on Gitlow v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:37 pm
Baker and Katherine M. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
Over here the UK Supreme Court gave judgment in Lee v Ashers in October following a hearing in May this year also deciding in favour of the baker. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
In Baker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
So too, in Flowers v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
No. 140 (S.C.); Lee v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:11 pm
There was very little press coverage and incomplete information on the Harrison, Pensa website. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:19 am
The chairman went to great lengths to ensure that the formalities of debate were meticulously observed Regular readers of this weblog will recall that, following the United Kingdom Supreme Court's recent decision to grant permission to appeal against the Court of Appeal's controversial ruling on the application of the "temporary copying" exception in NLA v Meltwater [2011] EWCA Civ 890 [noted by the IPKat here; criticised by Lionel Bently here], Baker… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm
We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v… [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
South is of course far larger and more wide-ranging than just the direct legacy of Brown v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:32 pm
In this context, CAAF’s 3-2 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:20 am
That follows from Little Sisters of the Poor, which may be the first time a reproductive rights case has been cited by the CIT (but I have not checked that).Judge Baker then moved on to the question of whether the Coalition is legally even a "thing. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:52 pm
That leaves 17, but we can detect little bidness meat on the remaining bone. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
The Supreme Court had little difficulty rejecting this argument. [read post]
Last Chance to Vote for the 2014 Privies — Plus Sebelius v. Reding for Privacy Hypocrite of the Year
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
(Stewart Baker) Voting for the 2014 Privy Awards for Dubious Achievement in Privacy Law will close at noon EST tomorrow, January 1, 2014. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Baker J simply made the relevant orders, whereas Binchy J handed down a full judgment explaining that section 27 was the reason why he refused to award the injunctions against the defamatory posts. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
After Baker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 3:07 pm
- Ex: 800-JR CIGAR v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:16 am
Baker (Vt. [read post]
