Search for: "BELL v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 10:00 pm
The Plaintiffs argued the unconstitutionality of the Medicare Negotiation Program under the Fifth Amendment by relying on Michigan Bell v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 10:41 am
Having all the policy bells and whistles in place is of limited use if the amount of cover is severely restricted financially. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
State laboratories can send STEC cultures to the CDC to determine the serotype. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 9:30 pm
Paul Lombardo, Georgia State University, on Buck v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:24 pm
In this 1920s case, an art expert told a newspaper that a painting an owner claimed was La Belle Ferronnière was inauthentic, cratering its potential resale price, and a lawsuit was filed against the expert.[19] A more contemporary example is Thompson v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Bell, Dan Dorosin, and Ron C. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Bell, Dan Dorosin, and Ron C. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
Here is a copy of the decision in PDF: Maher v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:24 am
Pacific Bell Tel. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 11:31 am
While it is a close case, the Court concludes that under the pleading standards set forth in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:28 pm
The volume on The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws, edited by Sarah McKibbin (University of Southern Queensland) and Anthony Kennedy (Serle Court), recently published by Hart, does just that, by discussing cases like Vita Food Products, Brook v Brook, Bonython v Commonwealth of Australia, AG v Heinemann Publishers (better known as the Australian Spycatcher case), Bremen v Zapata, Vizcaya v Picard, and Kuwait Airways (Nos 4 and 5). [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:51 am
Here is the abstract: Professor Derrick Bell stated, “At its essence, the willingness to protest represents less... [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
’” United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land, 441 U.S. 506, 510–11 (1979) (quoting Olson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
This is the third segment in EFF’s series on the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention focusing on Chapter V, International Cooperation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
Member States aim for total consensus on the draft convention's text. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Joyce & Wicked Willow Press, LLC v. [read post]
