Search for: "BLOCK v. USA" Results 61 - 80 of 658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 11:18 am by Howard Knopf
The reasoning in these judgments has helped keep Canada relatively free so far from the outrageous excesses we have sometimes seen in the mass trolling cases in the USA. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm by Michael Lowe
  For more, read our earlier discussion in: Buying Sex in Texas: Texas is First State in USA to Make Solicitation of Prostitution a Felony Offense. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
The Court of Appeal held that misuse of private information and contravention of the statutory data protection requirements was a tort and therefore, if damage had been sustained within England, the English courts had jurisdiction and service to the USA (California) was allowed. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Even though between a” legal rock and hard place”, PRC defendants cannot enter the U.S. market expecting a possible shield from unfavorable discovery by PRC blocking statutes. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
The US Government has succeeded in its appeal against the decision not to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (USA v Julian Assange [2021] EWHC 3313 (Admin)). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Statutes of limitations typically block them from justice and give religions cover, which harms the public good. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
Wisconsin Elections Commission, Dec. 4, 2020) and a request to block the certification of the state vote (Mueller v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, plaintiff cannot recover legal fees it incurred to defend the slander of title matter and to prosecute the case to obtain the escrow funds since those suits are not causally related to defendant’s alleged negligence (see Pyne v Block & Assoc., 305 AD2d 213 [1st Dept 2003]). [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” The six-week mark is a trap to block girls from ending a pregnancy that can ruin their lives, while the vigilante provisions let adults prey on girls for $10,000. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
This is intended to address the NAFTA shortcoming where parties were able to effectively block the process by simply not nominating panelists. [read post]
The court also held that DACA failed the first step in Chevron USA v Natural Res. [read post]