Search for: "BNSF Railway Co." Results 61 - 80 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by Sme
Colorado Seminary (10th Circuit, June 2, 2017) (affirming summary judgment against Hiatt on her sexual discrimination and retaliation claims:  Hiatt failed to show defendant's actions were pretext for either discrimination or retaliation)Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and DiseaseBNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
” The justices held 8-1 in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:10 pm by Stephen Sachs
As it happens, my most-looked-for opinion was released this morning, in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:03 pm by Jennifer Suder
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] Tuesday in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Massachusetts, BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 1:17 pm by Oyez Project
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
   Yesterday the court heard oral argument in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:56 am by Andrew Hamm
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County is here; the transcript in BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 8:50 am by Rachel Gerber
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, and BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
The second argument today of the day is BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
The plaintiffs in the two cases are Robert Nelson of North Dakota, who alleges that he suffered a serious knee injury while working for BNSF Railway Co. in Washington state as a fuel truck driver, and Kelli Tyrrell of South Dakota, who contends that her husband, Brent, contracted cancer and died as the result of his exposure to chemicals while working for BNSF in South Dakota, Minnesota and Iowa. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:31 pm by Will Baude
BNSF Railway Co. should win this case, but on statutory grounds alone. [read post]