Search for: "BORDEN v. DAY"
Results 61 - 80
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
Got an email the other day from Hannibal El-Mohtar, a Canadian lawyer pursuing an advanced law degree (an LLM) at Peking University. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 12:03 pm
Briar et al v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
Dukes Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:46 am
In Coward v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
M.H. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
In doing so, the court placed emphasis on the position under English law as emphasized in Payton v Snelling,[2] Lampard; Reckitt & Colman v Borden;[3] and Pasquali Cigarette Co Ltd v Diaconicolas & Capsopolus.[4] The first and foremost factor, as the court stressed, would be to identify the features in the plaintiff’s product that are distinctive to him or her. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/80gI93fnmZ -> Bell appeals CRTC ruling forcing company to sell fibre internet access to small ISPs https://t.co/bPpIts12vV -> ECHR finds interception of mobile communications in Russia violated privacy rights ROMAN ZAKHAROV v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
Three lemons: bad newsfor passing-off plaintiffsThe question to be decided at appeal was whether this reputation among a significant section of the public in the UK, in the absence of goodwill, was enough to form the basis of a successful passing off action where the remaining requirements of misrepresentation and damage in the classic Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 ‘Jif Lemon’ trinity of criteria were satisfied. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
This article provides more details on the following comment that I posted (April 10th) to Dan Pinnington’s article of April 8th, “Ontario Judge Strongly Pushes for Greater Use of Technology in Courts and Orders E-Trial”: My Comment, excerpted: Make the preparation work of a lawyer making production comparable to that of an accountant. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
| Canadian Lawyer Magazine – http://bit.ly/KWtyZT (Dara Nevin) When Litigation Hits, The First 7 to 10 Days is Critical – http://bit.ly/LigIC2 (Doug Austin) Who Can Get Your Tweets, and Can You Object? [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
This reality, and we argue here that it is a reality, is already conditioning the Trump presidency in overt ways visible every day. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
Agencies, Colleges Demand Applicants’ Facebook Passwords - bit.ly/y0CVNc (Bob Sullivan) HDD Shortages Spurring Storage Efficiencies - bit.ly/AujN59 (Esther Shein) IAPP Global Privacy Summit – Day 2 Recap - bit.ly/ydGTrJ (Frank Gonnello) Inside the Stratfor Attack – nyti.ms/w9CM5A (Nicole Perloth) Judge Rules that Apple Didn’t Invent the iPad! [read post]
