Search for: "BRIDGEPORT MUSIC, INC."
Results 61 - 75
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2008, 6:17 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
However, the district court's assessment of the various factors was not an abuse of discretion, and the court therefore affirmed the award.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (The Invent Blog),Brand promise and IP strategy: (IP ThinkTank),Cybersquatters have reached record numbers, says WIPO: (WIPO), (Ars Technica), (IPKat)Global - PatentsForbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz),More on Bessen and Meurer and their book ‘Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers put Innovators at Risk’: (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),… [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
We hold that the district court applied an inc orrect legal standard in determining Defendant's summary judgment motion. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property
Non-Party's Production of ‘New Media' Documents Not Overly Burdensome; Subpoena Not Quashed
Bridgeport Music Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
The Sixth Circuit agreed with the district court's decision that the plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence that Universal had granted a license, and therefore contributorily infringed Bridgeport's copyright, and that receipt of royalties alone by Universal was insufficient to create contributory copyright infringement.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:49 pm
A jury awarded Stephen Popovich over five million dollars on his claim that Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., breached its duty to affix Popovich's record company logo to four Meat Loaf albums. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Sixth Circuit did, however, reverse and remand the judgment due to the excessive punitive damages award and the inclusion of prejudgment and compound interest in the compensatory award.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 6:40 pm
Bridgeport Music, Inc. and Southfield Music, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 7:21 am
Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 9:00 pm
DMCA Safe Harbor Provisions: Funkadelic Enforcement; From: Bridgeport Music, Inc. and Southfield Music, Inc. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 9:06 pm
"Similar to its cousins the patent trolls, [Bridgeport Music Inc.] and companies like it hold portfolios of old rights (sometimes accumulated in dubious fashion) and use lawsuits to extort money from successful music artists for routine sampling, no matter how minimal or unnoticeable. ... [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 2:03 pm
He covers the litigation crusade of Bridgeport Music, Inc., which holds "portfolios of old rights (sometimes accumulated in dubious fashion) and use[s] lawsuits to extort money from successful music artists for routine sampling, no matter how minimal or unnoticeable. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 6:10 am
Instead, a company called Bridgeport Music Inc. alleged to own the rights to the Madonna song and was suing on its own behalf.Bridgeport is a one-man corporation (termed a "catalog company") owned by a former music producer named Armen Boladian. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 1:51 pm
Why folks have been getting so worked up about runaway copyright application and enforcement in the digital realm — looking at the Bridgeport case, showing where it takes us: The shady one-man corporation thats destroying hip-hop Last week, a mysterious company, Bridgeport Music Inc., sued hip-hop mogul Jay-Z, accusing him of breaking the law when he recorded his 2003 single “Justify My Thug.” The song is an obvious nod to Madonna’s… [read post]
