Search for: "BURGESS v. BURGESS" Results 61 - 80 of 397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Burgess J, delivering the interim judgment in this case, refused the plaintiff’s application. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
At Medium, Katy Naples-Mitchell urges the justices to review Johnson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Gerald Kogan looks at Jones v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico, Burgess Everett reports that “Flake is one of 11 Republicans on the narrowly divided panel and without his support, the committee cannot advance his nomination. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Michelle Goldberg maintains that Kavanaugh’s opinion in Garza v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” At Politico, Burgess Everett reports that “[v]oters in three conservative states where Senate Democrats are up for reelection want their senators to support … Kavanaugh,” according to a new GOP poll. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Burgess Everett reports at Politico that “[t]he potential lawsuit would come right as Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings begin in early September. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Timothy O’Neill discusses Timbs v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
In a CNN interview after Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement, Collins told Jake Tapper that she “would not support a nominee who demonstrated hostility to Roe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” In the Penn Program on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Eric Fikry explains why last term’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]