Search for: "Baker v. Lord"
Results 61 - 80
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2019, 3:45 am
– Persephone Bridgman Baker Libel Injunctions: Time to revisit the rule in Bonnard v Perryman? [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:28 pm
But, in a nifty piece of footwork, Baker v R [1975] AC 774 sets out that where an inferior court is confronted by two directly conflicting decisions of a higher court, the inferior court was entitled to chose the decision that appeared the most logical. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The Judge quoted Lord Brightman in Ex p. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The Judge quoted Lord Brightman in Ex p. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:09 am
The European Court of Human Rights released its judgment in the case of Mosley v UK on Tuesday. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Its name is Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 609 and it's a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sedley LJ, Rimer LJ and Sir Scott Baker) last Wednesday, 2 June.Asda (the British embodiment of Walmart) sold its own health food products, some of which were labelled with appealing little phrases like "No hidden nasties" and "No artificial colours or flavours and no aspartame". [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm
I asked Mr Baker during his submissions how a person who had been convicted of stealing a car could be described in accordance with his analysis of section 4. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am
When it was submitted to the House of Lords that the operation of these doctrines would violate Article 6 ECHR, Lord Hoffmann said that there seemed to him ‘to be much force in this submission’ (R v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
See generally the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in the judgment of Scott Baker J in R (Khan) v London Borough of Newham [2001] EWHC Admin 589 at paragraphs 8 to 14. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am
The review panel was composed of three independent lawyers: Rt Hon Sir Scott Baker, David Perry QC and Anand Doobay. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
alp v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 6:52 pm
Furthermore, Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Pepper v Hart said that Article IX was ‘a provision of the highest constitutional importance’ which ‘should not be narrowly construed’. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 7:24 am
” The cakeshop and DOJ rely heavily on Hurley v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731) Lord Diplock established five criteria for a claim of extended passing off. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 5 November 2019 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Hemming v Baker [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB). [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm
The sentence was quashed this week after the Lord Chief Justice found that the trial judge had misdirected the jury on a key aspect of the offence. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
The Court should have perhaps established a ‘litmus test’ setting out criteria to determine instances when one has been “prejudiced enough” something akin to the balancing test set out in the American case, Baker v Wingo[22]. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
Indeed, not dissimilar to Lord Mance’s emphasis on the Claimant’s family life in the Supreme Court case of PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd in the context of privacy claims, the judgment in AXB v BXA serves to illustrate that the Court will continue to place great emphasis when the Claimant’s family members, in particular spouses and young children, are also plainly adversely affected by both the Defendant’s course of conduct and the publicity that… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Ellis v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
JFS sought leave to appeal to the then House of Lords, which was granted. [read post]
