Search for: "Baker v. Tennessee"
Results 61 - 80
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 495-96 (2008). [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 6:34 pm
– Dallas non-compete attorney Rob Radcliff on his Smooth Transitions Law Blog Steptoe Cyberlaw Podcast – Interview with Ari Schwartz – Washington, DC lawyer Stewart Baker of Steptoe & Johnson on the Steptoe Cyberblog Thoughts on Supreme Court Oral Argument in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 767 F.3d 526 (6th Cir. 2014) (applying Tennessee law); Tuttle v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm
Baker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:01 pm
Hodges expressly overruled the Court’s only prior ruling directly on same-sex marriage — a one-line decision in the 1972 case of Baker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm
Hodges) and Tennessee (Tanco v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm
That was the summary ruling in Baker v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
Baker v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Haslam (Tennessee), DeBoer v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
From the point of view of the four states involved in the cases, their lawyers apparently will not be prevented from making arguments on two points to try to help them salvage their bans: first, the Supreme Court settled that issue in a summary ruling in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:31 pm
Virginia and Baker v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Haslam, 14-562 (Tennessee), DeBoer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Constitution by depriving same-sex couples of the fundamental right to marry, including recognition of their lawful, out-of-state marriages; (2) whether a state impermissibly infringes upon same-sex couples’ fundamental right to interstate travel by refusing to recognize their lawful out-of-state marriages; and (3) whether this Court’s summary dismissal in Baker v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm
It remains one of only three decisions in federal trial courts to uphold a ban, but the judges in the other two did not address the issue directly, finding that they had no authority to consider the issue because they were bound by a one-line Supreme Court decision in 1972 (Baker v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:37 am
It basically argues that Oracle should have lost based on Baker v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:04 am
It found that view reinforced by a one-sentence Supreme Court decision in 1972, Baker v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:44 pm
After dutifully arguing for four pages that he was bound by the ancient one-line decision from the Supreme Court in Baker v. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm
In the case of Castellanos v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
The relatively painless resolution Sutton seemed to favor at oral argument on August 6, ruling that the one-sentence rejection of a same-sex marriage case in 1972′s Baker v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
Under this approach, the Sixth Circuit would consider itself bound by the one-sentence order in 1972’s Baker v. [read post]
