Search for: "Ball v. Harris" Results 61 - 80 of 133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Harris appears to have responded to a post on the Legal Cheek blog here. [read post]
23 May 2025, 1:38 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
District Court, with a memorandum and order issued March 4 in the MSPB case, Harris v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Even as a judge on the Eighth Circuit, Harry Blackmun was substantially more liberal than President Nixon realized, but it was not until after he wrote the majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:48 am by SHG
It may be that his fast ball has lost its speed over the years. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States 11-9335Issue: Whether this Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  We lack Mr Stephens’ crystal ball but it seems to us that the Government is approaching these issues with an open mind. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402, got the ball rolling. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relatively few vendors out there (Harris and eRewards most popular). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court N D California: ‘Greed’ and overreaching forfeit sanctions award: Goodman Ball, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:05 pm by Carter Ruml
 Olmstead may not be as important as, say, Gore v. [read post]