Search for: "Banks v. Junk" Results 61 - 80 of 90
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2011, 8:57 pm
This audit merely verified that customer funds were on deposit at the bank(s) where MF Global represented that they were and in the amount that they were supposed to be. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:20 am by SHG
” I’m not an expert on this area of law, but I do know that a district court recently upheld a similar law, in Genesee Scrap & Tin Baling Co. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
It merely provides that payment for junk must be in the form of a check, which in turn is payable in United States currency. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Summit and affiliates publish magazines and websites and produce conferences for the insurance, accounting, financial services, banking and legal industries. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Sources: Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:53 am by Maxwell Kennerly
PNC Bank, 792 A.2d 602, 607-08 (Pa.Super.Ct.2002), and our Court has interpreted the rule to apply to all Consumer Protection Law subsections, see Santana Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:57 pm by Mike
Industries claimed these were junk faxes, and the bank argued they weren't. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm by Buce
I'd fault it on three, maybe two an a half, issues at least though: One, "fallen angels" v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 1:34 pm by Justin Walsh
At issue was a bank deceiving customers by gouging their transactions with illegal junk fees like a “fax fee” and “notary fee. [read post]