Search for: "Barber v. Wells"
Results 61 - 80
of 185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
The company may well be held liable and could end up with a nasty bill, which may not be covered by employers’ liability insurance. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:52 pm
The decision has not gone over well with elder care advocates. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:34 am
As we reported last week on Monday 26 July 2010, the libel trial in Bryce v Barber began in front of Mr Justice Tugendhat. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
Barber v London Borough of Croydon [2010] EWCA Civ 51 (our report here) was referred to and followed in finding it was not reasonable of Peabody to have done nothing except the referrals to the welfare benefits team, as Peabody had failed to follow their own policy. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
Hood seemed hopelessly out of his element talking about, well, just about anything you would expect him to know about, but especially the Renfroe v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
In particular, the problem of Fry J's well-known five probanda in Willmott v Barber (1880) 15 Ch D 96, at 105, which has bedevilled this area in the past, is again at stake here because eg it was not known whether the Defendants' predecessor in title had made a mistake as to his legal rights (probanda 1). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
FL 2016)It is well established that the existence of a license is an affirmative defense to a copyright infringement claim. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:47 am
AB 5 will impact the workforce as well as consumers in California. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 12:22 pm
DivorceIn Gill v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 10:24 am
In Joiner v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:10 pm
Lett, Barber v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 3:32 am
August 3, 2023 - 1 PM: Mealpass, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:08 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Barber v. [read post]
