Search for: "Barclay v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am by familoo
UNITED STATES OF … and this one : Another Marvel in the Inbox – – Crossroads – WordPress.com :-p [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm by Marta Requejo
Barclays, Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (2014), 1095). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court held that the courts of the United Kingdom do have jurisdiction to judicially review an Order in Council which is made on the advice of the Government of the United Kingdom acting in whole or in part in the interests of the United Kingdom. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
GravesCase number: 11-cv-00176 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee)Case filed: April 15, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 1, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-107 SEC v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 1:13 pm by Mark Astarita
" Years later the Supreme Court adopted this misreading, in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
” From 2011 to the present, Barclays embarked on a business strategy to dramatically increase the market share of its dark pool, with the goal of making it the largest dark pool in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Jocelyn Hutton
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions,heard 29-30 April. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:01 am by Barbara Shreero
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in Weisfelner v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Also, Barclays and UBS have reportedly hired criminal defense lawyers to represent employees with regard to the investigations.[15]   For the most part, the regulators that have made public statements about the investigations have only stated that the investigations remain in the early stages. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:51 am by Kevin LaCroix
Nevertheless, IOSCO members (like the United States) regulate 95 percent of the world’s securities markets. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am by Graham Smith
(as he then was) cautioned in IBCOS Computers Limited v Barclays Mercantile Highland Finance Limited [1994] FSR 275 that while merely taking a sufficiently general idea does not infringe, to take a detailed “idea” may do so. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]