Search for: "Barnes, et al v. United States, et al"
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
This case concerns a consolidated appeal by Sensations, Inc. et al. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:08 pm
Also, if the "second half" of the Bt gene would be deleted, as Barnes et al. suggests, the remaining part would encode a protein of 576 amino acids, which is not toxic. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Barnes & Noble Inc et al filed 03/02/07 1:07-cv-01324 Dudkowski v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Here is the 12/17/03 opinion in D & M Healthcare, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 11:16 am
United Consulting Engineers, Inc.; United Consulting Engineers, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Two unit managers report to the DON. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 9:25 am
Roob, Jr., et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
One can find in the Yugoslavia court cases many instances of criminal liability for wanton and disproportionate devastation, involving, say, a Serb paramilitary unit deliberately trashing a village. [read post]
