Search for: "Barrett v. Failing" Results 61 - 80 of 626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 11:45 am by Steve Gottlieb
With Thomas and the Trump trio – Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett – this is the crew that struck down Roe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
” Part V will respond to recent academic arguments suggesting that the President is an “officer of the United States” for purposes of Section 3. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Nonetheless, there is reason to hope that Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett—who fully joined Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Whole Woman’s Health but did not join his statement in Missouri v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm by Shams Hirji
  In so doing, Judge Kethledge relied heavily on an en-banc dissent written by then-Judge Barrett in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm by Guest Author
” Even Justice Barrett, who sees the major questions doctrine as an ambiguity canon rather than a clear statement rule, focuses not on Congress but the Executive when applying it in her Biden v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Influencers like Isabella Barrett, 15, are worth millions for “livin the life girl! [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]