Search for: "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona"
Results 61 - 65
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2007, 12:27 pm
As far back as 1977, however, the Supreme Court noted in Bates v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 7:59 am
It has been thirty years since Bates v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:25 am
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:11 pm
Supreme Court decision, Bates v. [read post]
