Search for: "Battles v. Social Security Administration"
Results 61 - 80
of 275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 7:25 pm
COVID-19 provided the necessary acceleration to move that discursive battle to regulatory reform. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:04 pm
In US v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
The BBC explains why the US is going after the popular social media app. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 3:57 am
Sh. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
On Feb. 11, after Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas was confirmed, DHS announced that it would begin Phase 1 of a program to restore processing for those individuals already enrolled. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Legal battles have framed the importance of sexual and reproductive rights and challenged administrative barriers to accessing legal abortion. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am
A curated weekday guide to major national security news and developments over the past 24 hours. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 9:45 pm
The year began amid serious efforts by governments across the world to battle the fallout of the financial crisis. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am
In one form, solitary is known as “administrative segregation” and is officially imposed on the basis of general managerial rationales, like protecting the “safety and security” of the institution. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:05 pm
Accordingly, the slight differences in actions and words of Obama v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
See Battle Creek Health Sys. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 9:30 am
This oft-cited dictum from United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm
Rebels claim they have stabilized the new battle lines and continue to resist Shiite militias allied with the regime that are approaching from the south. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
The Joint Chiefs of Staff wrote in a letter to Congress that they will not work with the Obama Administration to transfer remaining Guantánamo prisoners to the United States unless the law prohibiting such transfers is changed. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court in Boumediene v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
That’s not much of an overstatement; the passage of the amendment came after 41 years diplomatic, political, and legal battles. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 11:13 am
NFIB v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:15 am
We augmented the administrative record with the client’s favorable Social Security disability finding. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
