Search for: "Beebe v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2014, 1:42 pm
The Supreme Court has expressed concerns how the facial challenge might be used to undermine the legislative process, and accordingly, the challenging party is held to a higher standard of proof: To succeed in a typical facial attack, [the respondent] would have to establish “that no set of circumstances exists under which [the statute] would be valid”, United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 12:15 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:28 am
- featuring Wilson Sonsini's David Berger, Chevron's Lydia Beebe, Davis Polk's Ning Chiu and Bill Kelly and Wachtell Lipton's Ted Mirvis. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 1:43 pm
– 5:05 P.M.SESSION V (with coffee break 3:30-3:50)NYS CLE Credit: 2.0, Areas of Professional PracticeCommentators on proposals presented, and Q&A PeriodJane Ginsburg, ModeratorMorton L. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
See Atonio v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:41 am
Recently, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Rembrandt Vision Technologies v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
Prince v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:49 pm
Beebe v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:52 am
Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
Democratic Governor Mike Beebe can’t seem to catch a break in Arkansas, as the state’s Republican-led Senate has overridden yet another one of his vetoes. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Example: LV v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
Sprigman: Came up in Apple v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:56 am
The Arkansas Supreme Court ruling in Hobbs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am
On Friday, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in Hobbs v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
