Search for: "Been v. Davis"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
The Alien Enemies Act has been used three times, each involving a declared war: the War of 1812, World War I, and World War II. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:15 am
Kruse v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Davis and McCleskey v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 3:10 am
Our last article looked at two cases that have been briefed and argued before the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
by Dennis Crouch In Vanda v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:24 pm
Davis, 737 So. 2d 1170, 1172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (quoting Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
“A parent who has been allocated a majority of parenting time or either parent who has been allocated equal parenting time may seek to relocate with a child. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Jefferson Davis: President of the United States? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
