Search for: "Begum v. Begum"
Results 61 - 80
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2013, 3:57 pm
[Hall v Wandsworth at 29]Mitu v Camden LBC [2011] EWCA Civ 1249 is taken as an explanation of Hall, when Lewison LJ says:Section 203 (4) distinguishes between a “decision” and an “issue”. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:26 pm
" US v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 2:46 am
However, in fact it is possible that the UK courts could take a more generous view of human rights protections in a given case than Strasbourg would (see, for example, some Article 9 cases such as R(Begum) v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
”The County Court jurisdiction was “in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review”, Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
”The County Court jurisdiction was “in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review”, Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 pm
Whilst appeal by way of judicial review can be sufficient to satisfy Article 6, as Lord Hoffman stated in R(Begum) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council, the initial decision-making process needs to be “fair” at the very least. [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
In Mahboob Sahab v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 12:13 pm
Amy Jackson’s ‘A critical legal pluralist analysis of the Begum Case’, Osgoode CLPE Research Paper No. 46/2010, is available on SSRN here: This paper considers the advantages of a critical legal pluralist analysis of the English case R (on the application of Begum) v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
The general rule of notification to an agent is in R v Chief Immigration Officer Manchester Airport ex p Insah Begum [1973] 1 WLR 141 and followed in Tkachuk v SoS for work and Pensions [2007] EWCA Civ 515. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
The general rule of notification to an agent is in R v Chief Immigration Officer Manchester Airport ex p Insah Begum [1973] 1 WLR 141 and followed in Tkachuk v SoS for work and Pensions [2007] EWCA Civ 515. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:11 am
In State of Punjab v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 10:43 am
’ The cases re-written in the volume includes: Re G (Children), Royal Bank of Scotland Plc v Etridge (No 2), R v Brown, YL v Birmingham City Council and Others and R (Begum) v Governors of Denbigh High School. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am
Griffiths v St Helens MBC [2006] EWCA Civ 160, Slater v Lewisham LBC [2006] EWCA Civ 394, [2006] HLR 37, Tower Hamlets LBC v Rahanara Begum [2005] EWCA Civ 116 considered. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:54 am
Griffiths v St Helens MBC [2006] EWCA Civ 160, Slater v Lewisham LBC [2006] EWCA Civ 394, [2006] HLR 37, Tower Hamlets LBC v Rahanara Begum [2005] EWCA Civ 116 considered. [read post]
