Search for: "Bell v. District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
Courts of Appeals for the 5th, 6th, 7th, 11th and District of Columbia Circuits), or whether a court is “bound to defer” to a foreign government’s legal statement, as a matter of international comity, whenever the foreign government appears before the court (as held by the opinion below in accord with the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
March 26, 2014) (District of Columbia) (non-product liability). [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:51 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to determine whether a party seeking to enforce an arbitration agreement is in default. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Google (see “Case Law, Hamburg District Court: Max Mosley v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Together with the serial relist of Friedman, the fate of Caetano will give our clearest indication yet whether the Court has any appetite to add gloss to District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that President Barack Obama’s decision to expand the Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument in Oregon was unlawful. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
App. 1993); Southwestern Bell Tel. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417, 426 (2d Cir. 1969).District of Columbia: McNeil Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 12:22 am
On summary judgment, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that plaintiffs Wyeth and Elan Pharma International Ltd. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
PLIVA, Inc., 720 F.3d 739, 744 (8th Cir. 2013); Bell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in March 2018, was recused. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Do read Marie-Andrée’s report of the decision just issued by the Southern District Court of New York (SDNY) if you want to know! [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
GenOway v S.A. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 3:45 pm
In a 1986 decision, Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm
In a sense, that’s not terribly surprising, since Judge David Hamilton had previously taken the same track (if less explicitly) in his previous opinion while still on a district court judge in Hofts v. [read post]
