Search for: "Board of Education v. King"
Results 61 - 80
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2021, 12:00 pm
Board of Education, the landmark decision that ended racial segregation in the U.S., Justice Marshall represented innocent Black men charged with and convicted of rape and murder in the Deep South. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:50 pm
Board), racial bias in the criminal legal system (Powell v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am
[Sophia M.], 179 A.D.3d at 802, quoting People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE Ministerial v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
UPDATE Ministerial v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Ct., Kings County] ), and warrant the denial of summary judgment sought by the party accused of adulterous behavior. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
Danny O'Brien: Worst, corporations have even tried to twist th king sure that we don't lose a right that we've always had before the net came along. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:18 am
City of Houston v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
Board of Education, ending segregated public schools (1964 election); Miranda v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Mountain Lion Foundation v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:04 pm
King, and Edward B. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 9:01 am
In Espinoza v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:54 am
Board of Education, which legally ended segregation. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
” But precisely because racism now stands—or should stand—as a primary example of properly-repudiated bigotry, present-day rhetoric of bigotry is highly charged for it carries with it evocations of this repudiated past.In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:49 pm
Board of Education and Loving, I was interested to see whether and how such rhetoric featured in the Palmore litigation. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester… [read post]
