Search for: "Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 2:52 pm
Superior Court (2006) 143 Cal App. 4th 742. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
(B245131; 224 Cal.App.4th 1105; Los Angeles County Superior Court; BS131347.) [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:23 pm
The case arises out of the Maricopa County wars, when former County Attorney and now gubernatorial candidate Andrew Thomas, with the help of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, indicted several sitting Superior Court judges and several members of the County’s Board of Supervisors, including Mary Rose Wilcox, over funds slated for a new county courthouse . [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
Fee enhancement request for exceptional delay; passage of time and superior work product found not so exceptional in itself as to warrant a fee enhancement The Complainants’ also sought an across-the-board 20% fee enhancement under Perdue v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
The court acknowledged that if the employee were a supervisor, then his Facebook post would not be protected, as Section 8(a)(3) does not protect supervisors. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:30 pm
The County Board of Supervisors certified the FEIR and approved the Williamson Act contract cancellations on October 12, 2010. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:53 am
The Commission certified the FEIR and voted 3-2 to recommend the staff alternative to County’s Board of Supervisors. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Following a bench trial and supplemental motion for summary judgment, the Superior Court, Graham County, denied electors’ request for injunctive relief. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
The Circuit Court said that while it did not generally have jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board, it did have jurisdiction over this type of “mixed case,” citing Wiggins v US Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file… [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:01 am
The County may also bring a civil action in Superior Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:57 am
Tatum had been charged with being AWOL on multiple occasions, failing to sign-out of the correctional facility to which he was assigned, failing to contact his superiors when required, and insubordination by failing to obey a supervisor’s order. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 11:19 pm
Superior Court (1988) 45 Cal.3d 491, in which the California Supreme Court concluded that implementation of special legislation concerning transportation facility funding in Orange was reserved exclusively to city councils and board of supervisors, not the voters. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162: The processing of sequential boundary line adjustments is categorically exempt from CEQA, as long as a discretionary permit is not concurrently processed. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:46 am
*The court also referred to the decisions in Matter of Karp v North Country Community College, 258 AD2d 775; Matter of Rubenstein v Simpson, 109 AD2d 885; and Dow v Board of Trustees of Farmingdale Public Library, 75 AD2d 632 in support of its ruling.There are a number of variations on the right to payment for unused vacation accruals. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am
Lagleva, and Tara Evans filed the suit in Marin County Superior Court on Oct. 14, 2021, seeking to end the sheriff’s ALPR data-sharing practices. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:17 am
This issue was considered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Morningstar v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:17 am
This issue was considered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Morningstar v. [read post]
