Search for: "Bonn v. Bonn" Results 61 - 80 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2018, 10:34 am by Sara Moran
  More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post United Kingdom: Edwards Lifesciences LLC v Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, Patents Court, [2017] EWHC 405 (Pat), 03 March 2017 appeared first… [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 1:16 am by Sara Moran
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € The post United Kingdom: Edwards Lifesciences LLC v Boston Scientific Scimed Inc, High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, Patents Court, [2018] EWHC 1256 (Pat), 24 May 2018 appeared first on Kluwer… [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:11 am by Robert Margolis
The court also affirmed two district court rulings on remedies; specifically, that FI is not entitled to recover JFTCO’s profits and that a permanent injunction precluding JFTCO from ever using the Fabick family name was not necessary (Fabick, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Robert Margolis
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:12 am by Cheryl Beise
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:34 am by John W. Scanlan
The claims had been brought in good faith and the litigation was still at a very early stage (SnugglyCat, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:12 am by John W. Scanlan
The district court erred when it adopted factual findings made by a magistrate judge while deciding a motion for summary judgment because the magistrate judge had weighed the evidence (Heron Development Corp. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 12:55 am by Jeffrey H. Brochin
Therefore the TTAB was correct in granting the petition of competitor Ambev S.A. to cancel the mark due to abandonment (Cervejaria Petropolis SA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:32 am by Brian Craig
In affirming a district court’s dismissal because use of the marks constituted nominative fair use, the appeals court concluded that Applied’s service was not readily identifiable without use of the trademarks, the seminar creators used only so much of the trademarks as was reasonably necessary, and use of the trademarks did not suggest sponsorship or endorsement (Applied Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:37 am by Brian Craig
In affirming the federal district court’s dismissal of Neutron Depot’s suit alleging infringement of the INSURANCE DEPOT mark against Bankrate, the Fifth Circuit concluded that Neutron Depot did not own the mark outright at any point when the infringement took place (Neutron Depot, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:39 am by Robert B. Barnett
More from our authors: Mediation: Creating Value in International Intellectual Property Disputes by Théophile Margellos, Sophia Bonne, Gordon Humphreys, Sven Stürmann € Design Rights, Functionality and Scope of Protection by Chris Carani€ 199 [read post]