Search for: "Bonus of America, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by D. Daxton White
According to the report, FINRA alleged that Merrill required employees who participated in a $2.8 billion bonus program aimed at retaining high-producing brokers after the January 2009 merger with Bank of America Corp. to sign a promissory note that prevented them from arbitrating disagreements about the payments. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 6:54 am
According to FINRA, after merging with Bank of America in January 2009, Merrill Lynch implemented a bonus program, in the form of forgivable promissory notes, designed to retain high-producing brokers. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:54 am by Sonya Hubbard
Cooper, Chief Executive Officer—Americas, who will leave his job “no later than” February 29, 2012. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:43 am by Tomassi Law Associates
Vitro gained court approval last week to sell four of its U.S. units, including Vitro America LLC, to an affiliate of private-equity firm Sun Capital Partners Inc. for $55.1 million. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:31 pm by WIMS
and fewer jobs -- all at a time when our economic recovery remains fragile and America needs all three. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:51 am by Tomassi Law Associates
For 15 high-level mangers, Vitro is proposing a bonus pool of $267,700. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:07 am by Sonya Hubbard
” That brought to mind a couple of 8-Ks that Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
§ 112, 2nd Paragraph (Patent Docs) Summary of false marking settlements May – December 2010 (GRAY on Claims) Article One announces $25,000 bonus for 2010 (Article One Partners Blog) Should I request ex parte or inter partes reexamination? [read post]
The geothermal bonus: sustainable energy as a by-product of drilling for oil. 85 N.D. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:19 am
The covenant’s geographical and durational restrictions were reasonable and not greater than necessary to protect the interests of the franchisor, in the court's view.Because the noncompete covenant was valid and the requisite elements of injunctive relief were satisfied, the court granted the franchisor’s request for a preliminary injunction prohibiting the franchisee from transferring or diverting customers to any competitor of the franchisor, using the franchisor’s… [read post]