Search for: "Booker v. Smith*"
Results 61 - 80
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Sexton, No. 05-6412, 05-6415, 05-6416 Defendants' sentences for offenses stemming from the distribution of cocaine, imposed on a remand pursuant to Booker, are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the district court violated their Sixth Amendment and due process rights by using its own factual findings to calculate their sentencing ranges under the Guidelines; 2) the sentences exceeded the "maximum statutory sentence" allowable for their offenses; 3) imposition of their… [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
Booker v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 2:26 am
Lobi Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 2:59 pm
The slow Christmas week lets us stretch back a bit to catch an important recent case on sentencing loss calculation: United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 4:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm
Booker, 2010 U.S. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Yates v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 11:09 am
She gave speeches on the Chautauqua circuit and was known as “the female Booker T. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:12 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
The 3rd Circuit affirmed that in 2008, but last week the Supreme Court vacated that decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Smith v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:16 am
Hasan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am
Anthony, and Abraham Lincoln, schoolteachers like Nathan Hale and Booker T. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Booker Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0725n.06 USA v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
Booker, 250 N.C. 272 (1959). [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:43 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
Booker, 125 S. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:27 am
Booker, 125 S. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Issue: Whether, under Seminole Tribe v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:34 pm
” Booker, 2013 WL 2903562, at *7. [read post]
