Search for: "Borders v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 6,294
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm
In R. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:32 am
The employer failed to assist the applicant with his return to South Africa as requested by the applicant after the border was opened and the applicant had informed management that he had taken the required Covid-19 test at the border. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 1:52 am
The employer failed to assist the applicant with his return to South Africa as requested by the applicant after the border was opened and the applicant had informed management that he had taken the required Covid-19 test at the border. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:13 am
” According to the Court, that includes the right “to effective protection by the State authorities from serious adverse effects of climate change on their life, health, well-being and quality of life” (para 519).And it puts a positive obligation on the State “to adopt, and to effectively apply in practice, regulations and measures capable of mitigating the existing and potentially irreversible, future effects of climate change” (para 548).The ruling,… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
The Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Holder v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
Folks who’ve been following this blog for years know that periodically I like to venture beyond New York’s borders to find and report on interesting decisions from other states in business divorce cases. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Since MHCS’ trade mark has been filed prior to the accession of several Member States to the EU in 2004, 2007 and 2013, MHCS will not have to establish acquired distinctiveness for these ‘new Member States’ (Art. 209(4)(a) EUTMR). [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 7:40 pm
For those keeping score, I also held that view when blue states and others challenged Donald Trump's attempt to divert military funds to build his border wall, which I also opposed. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That is, that in the context of business and human rights, States are far better equipped to transpose public regulatory structures onto private activity than they are, for the moment at least, to actually bind themselves and their domestic legal orders to the very international human rights regime they are more than eager to foist down supply chains beyond the borders of the State. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:02 pm
The plaintiff states in this case (like the ones in Biden v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE The International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Thursday issued additional provisional measures in South Africa v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:42 am
BrazilSilveira v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 4:53 am
This issue will again be before the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
AGS CJ Corporation (Tribal Gaming; Tribal Lease Agreements) United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 12:42 pm
Meanwhile, the "invasion" issue will be before the Fifth Circuit again in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 6:39 am
They make cross-border litigation easier in Western Australia. [read post]
