Search for: "Boss Construction, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2015, 4:59 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” Second Circuit’s Decision The Greathouse plaintiff complained to his boss that he had not been paid in several months. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 3:03 am by Shannon Duvall, CTM
Under Duvall’s tenure, the company has consecutively been named to Inc. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
  But the government faces significant hurdles on that ground, notably the Court’s 1958 decision in The Colony, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 2:00 am by Mark I. Schickman, Schickman Law
Refusal to Sleep With Boss Pamela Pollock is a customer service representative at Tri-Modal Distribution Services, Inc., a corporation that ships freight by truck. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:15 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
For example, it notes that the proposed cleanup would create 40,000 new engineering and construction jobs in the near term as well as thousands of jobs to operate and maintain the new equipment! [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 5:57 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) ACS:Law and Logistep currently seeking settlement from around 6000 alleged file-sharers but ISPs doubt accuracy of evidence (TorrentFreak) We should have embraced Napster says BPI boss Geoff Taylor in op-ed piece for BBC (Ars Technica)   United States US General – Decisions 9th Circuit: Anti-spyware company protected by 47 USC 230(c)(2): Zango v Kaspersky Lab (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents How to patent… [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 8:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
After all, he said, construction is not the only hazardous business in Texas. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 2:34 pm by Lorene Park
Factors considered by courts vary depending on the theory of liability (e.g., as a “constructive” employer, joint employer, or otherwise), though there is some overlap. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon – Federal Circuit… [read post]