Search for: "Boss v. Boss"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2020, 4:30 am
When the employee/victim reported the boss/owner's comments, she was fired. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 9:00 am
A federal district judge in Texas yesterday ruled on the Government's motion to disqualify Tax Profs David Weisbach (Chicago) and Ethan Yale (Virginia) from testifying as expert witnesses in a Son of BOSS tax shelter case involving billionaire investor Andrew Beal, Belmont Investments, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:31 am
New London and Rapanos v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
In Guilmette v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:47 am
Does partner v. partner mean it's ok? [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 5:21 am
You can read the opinion in this case, Battle v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:00 am
" In this case, the whistleblower worked for a subsidiary of a holding company owned by the defendant company, and the court found that whistleblower failed to plead that his employer was one of the named defendants (Vuoncino v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 5:30 am
Salazar v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 3:18 am
Those were the facts in Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 6:46 am
Read the opinion The post KANISHK SHARMA v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
In the recent case of Atalla v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 7:12 am
"Someone from work, lets call him Stu, is friends with Sue, reads the post and tells Boss Man.Boss Man fires Sue for violating company policy. [read post]
13 Nov 2021, 12:41 pm
So, while you’re at it boss…would you mind taking a look? [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 12:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:23 pm
In 2003, the Bombay High Court in Zee Telefilms Ltd v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:00 pm
"] Today the Court heard oral argument in Torres v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:15 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:09 am
The Seventh Circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:12 pm
I always have a hard time teaching Donahue v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
My former boss, Judge Kozinski, dissented from denial of rehearing en banc in this case (U.S. v. [read post]
