Search for: "Branch v. Government Employees Insurance Company" Results 61 - 80 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Social Media Companies who ask their employees to delete tweets may be acting unlawfully. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am by Ryan Dolby-Stevens, Olswang LLP
Later, in Barker v Corus [2006] UKHL 20, the House of Lords decided that each employer was only liable pro rata in respect of the period of time the employee was exposed to asbestos under their employment. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:45 pm by Nursing Home Law Center LLC
Administrative agencies – Agencies created by the legislative branch of government to administer laws pertaining to specific areas such as taxes, transportation, and labor. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
BP contends that only the insurance policy language matters in deciding whether it is an "additional insured," citing cases such as EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
"  More importantly, Justice Kennedy signaled that in his view the assumption is warranted:  "[T]he Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) makes the case that the mandate serves the Government’s compelling interest in providing insurance coverage that is necessary to protect the health of female employees, coverage that is significantly more costly than for a male employee. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Gonzalez also listed his phone number as (305) 420–8152 -- the number for the cellphone that had received the text messages on July 13 and 15.Over the next few weeks, Gainesboro Med submitted several online claims to two . . . insurance companies, Wellpoint and Cigna. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  The second involves the internal governance structures of limited liability cooperatives. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 2:24 pm by Marty Lederman
The government's two religious accommodationsAs some of you may know, the Executive branch has provided two types of religious accommodations to nonprofit employers that object to the HHS Preventive Heath Services Rule:First, some such employers--primarily, churches and their auxiliaries--are exempt altogether from the requirement that they include contraceptive coverage if they offer a health-insurance plan to their employees. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 1:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
And as I understand the college and university exception, it assures employees coverage for the contraceptives through the insurance companies, though with no direct payment for it by the employers; that exception thus wouldn’t implicate either interest. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:28 pm by Ron Miller
In this instance, the call center employees alleged their insurance company employer failed to pay them for pre-shift time they had to spend ramping up for duty. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court in California has certified several Rule 23 classes and conditionally certified an FLSA collective action in a wage suit filed by call center employees who alleged their insurance company employer failed to pay them for pre-shift time they had to spend ramping up for duty (Ribot v Farmers Insurance Group, July 18, 2013, Pregerson, D). [read post]