Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am
His resignation came shortly after the Supreme Court unanimously decided United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm
The Judicial Branch's power of judicial review arises out of Marbury v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
After all, the Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution, treaties and laws of the United States supreme over state law, and while an agency regulation can plausibly be described as a "law" of the United States, it is hard to see how the exercise of prosecutorial discretion is a kind of federal "law" that preempts state law. [read post]
The Tax Court Is A Court, Not An Agency Of The Executive Branch, And Thus Is Not Subject To The FOIA
3 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
United States Tax Court, No. 15-1605 (D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 8:14 am
Benisek, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court decided that the judicial branch has no role... [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:24 pm
Secondly, the will of a sole senator can gum up the United States Senate. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:55 am
Section V analyzes the Oath or Affirmation Clause, which suggests that Senators and Representatives, as well as the President, are not “Officers of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
In our view, the phrase "Office . . . under the United States" refers to appointed positions in the Executive and Judicial Branches, as well as non-apex appointed positions in the Legislative Branch. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:05 am
In fact, the immigration court system is a branch of the Department of Justice, headed by the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:28 pm
United States, 505 U. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:22 pm
"And, with similar, but more alarming, sentiment, the dissent by Judge Staton, sitting by designation from the Central District of California:"In these proceedings, the government accepts as fact that the United States has reached a tipping point crying out for a concerted response—yet presses ahead toward calamity. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 9:34 am
I take no position on which branch should elect to do so.But it should happen. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm
Over in the judicial branch, the United States Supreme Court is considering whether the PDA requires employers to provide accommodations to pregnant employees to the same extent they provide them to disabled workers in Young v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 6:34 pm
The United States is also entitled to intervene in the lawsuits, as it did in these cases.This matter is being handled by the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Department of Justice’s Civil Division and the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
United States.To be sure, the Trump Court built upon a 1970s precedent in Nixon v. [read post]
