Search for: "Bridges v. Bell*" Results 61 - 80 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
PM and the passing of punitive damages class actions (2/27/07)Nagareda (implicitly) on preemption case selection (2/26/07)The bridges from Madison county (2/25/07)The Illinois Jensen case - a class action cautionary tale (2/22/07)Another stray thought on Williams v. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 5:18 am by Elina Saxena
Tim Edgar provided his final thoughts on reforming surveillance and European privacy rules in light of the European Court of Justice’s ruling in Schrems v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:11 am by Jim Walker
We drove across the bridge over the Tallahatchie River (my photo here) and said a prayer for Emmett. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Court of Appeal have granted permission to appeal in the facial recognition technology case of Bridges v Chief Constable of South Wales Police. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-652, which asks whether there is an exception to the prior exclusive jurisdiction rule when the United States brings a later-filed federal action seeking title to property within the jurisdiction of a state court; Bridges v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  Permission was refused in the cases of Rotenberg v Times Newspapers and Mionis v Democratic Press S.A. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
  The Administrative Court will give judgment in the facial recognition case of The Queen (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police on 4 September 2019. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:40 am by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
District Court for the District of Columbia has issued an injunction against the NSA's bulk metadata collection program in Klayman v. [read post]