Search for: "Brisbane v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 91
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(1709 Blog) Rightslink gets an upgrade (1709 Blog) Australia Fitzroy Football Club v Brisbane Lions –logo dispute settles (IP Whiteboard) FCA: Entitlement to a design: Courier Pete Pty Ltd v Metroll Queensland Pty Ltd (ipwars.com) (Class 99) (Patentology) Brazil The Brazilian Council of Cultural Entities gives its opinion – copyright reform (IP tango) Good news from Brazil – new online tools for tracking INPI processes; GIs (IP tango) Canada Plaintiff… [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:08 am
Accordingly States of destination should consider making orders that reflect those made in the State of origin. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:26 am
A constructive trust is different from the other types, as it is not dependent on intentions or conduct, but constructed by the court.Baumgartner v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
Theory of domestic violence[11] Once the sheer scale of domestic violence became clear, feminist theorists tried to work out what was happening and why. [12] Here is a useful summary of some of the theories:“The first theory developed in the United States was that men who battered women were mentally ill and that women who remained in violent relationships were also mentally ill. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 6:08 pm
The Full Court dismissed the appeal on this point, saying that Justice Rose had not erred in the exercise of discretion.Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm
These matterswere previously dealt with exclusively bystate courts under state law however thenew Part VIIIAB puts these mattersunder the jurisdiction of the Family Court and theFederal MagistratesCourt.2.34 These amendments did not apply to termination agreements. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:40 pm
NEW TRIAL LISTING SYSTEM - MURPHY J1.I intend implementing a new trial listing system for matters within my docket.2.I am doing so having consulted with a number of members of the professionand other judges, including judges in other States.3.Despite the increasing complexity of matters being dealt with by this court,matters continue to settle at, or very close to, "the door of the court" or whichadjourn. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:21 pm
Insurveys, they admit they value personal experience over research evidence...which, if accurate for family report writers here, is frightening stuff for those who have an "expert" write a report about their family, which may quite profound implications for their family, but who decides to ignore the research in favour of their own biases and opinions.Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
(emphasis added)Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 pm
Warnick Jfurther reflected on the rule at paragraph 48 where he states:48. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:58 pm
Warwick Rothnie considers Elwood v Cotton On and asks is copying enough to infringe Down Under?. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
: (Spicy IP) Events 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: US PLI ‘Advanced patent licensing 2008: What you need to know before licensing your patent’ – San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 13-14 June: Centre for European Economic Research conference on ‘The… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ -… [read post]
