Search for: "Britain v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to… [read post]
13 May 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to… [read post]
24 May 2011, 9:00 am
KISSINGER Secretary of State EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Desiring to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of offenders; Have agreed as follows: ARTICLE I Each Contracting Party undertakes to… [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:17 am
The arguments Appellant The appellant argued that the Court of Justice (CJEU) decision in Richards v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-423/04) demonstrated that the art 4 prohibition on gender discrimination extended to those who had acquired gender by later reassignment. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 4:02 am
Current state of the law The House of Lords decision in Lawson v Serco Ltd [2006] ICR 250 is the leading case in this area. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v Great Britain) (1924–27)Michael Waibel4. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 4:15 am
In Steinfeld & Keidan v Secretary of State for Education, (EWCA, Feb. 21, 2017), Britain's Court of Appeal, in a 2-1 decision, rejected a challenge to British law that allows same-sex couples, but not opposite-sex couples, to enter civil partnerships as an alternative to marriage. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:58 am
Great Britain, Austria, and the Netherlands). [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:32 am
In Peck v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
This proved to be true of Britain as well as the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Cf Bush v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Her claim was refused on the basis that she was not “in Great Britain”, as that term was (at the material time) defined in regulation 2 of the State Pension Credit Regulations 2002 as amended (“the 2002 Regulations”). [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 8:31 pm
In PS (Iran) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:04 am
In Hamat v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:32 am
Not only are extraterritorial laws inherently undemocratic (regulating foreigners, with no say in domestic political processes), but they also can retard and interfere with the creation of meaningful harmonized international, state-to-state agreements. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:20 pm
In London Borough of Islington v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
But by the 18th century, inventors were busy in Britain and invention patents came to be seen in a different light. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
