Search for: "British Telecommunications PLC"
Results 61 - 80
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2017, 1:00 am
RFC 2012 Plc (in liquidation) (formerly The Rangers Football Club Plc) v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland), heard 15-16 Mar 2017. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:20 am
The decision in the case follows a recent criminal conviction in the UK against a distributor of set top boxes (often referred to as “Kodi boxes”) and a blocking injunction in that country to prevent streaming of sports league content to such boxes in The Football Association Premier League Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc & Ors [2017] EWHC 480 (Ch) (13 March 2017) case. [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:30 am
However, LJ Lewison (giving the leading unanimous judgment) referred to an exception in that where a defect occurs within the demised premises and the repairing obligation is the landlord’s, the landlord will only be in breach where he has received information of the defect and has not remedied the defect with reasonable expedition thereafter (British Telecommunications plc v Sun Life Assurance Society plc [1996] Ch 69). [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
Canada Telecommunications provider Northwestel has dropped its defamation lawsuit against a Whitehorse company and its owner. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 2:06 am
What this has been interpreted in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc to encompass is true knowledge of one or more infringers using the provided network to do so, and the more detail of knowledge or facts given to the service provider (notices etc.) the less protection the provision offers to them. [read post]
15 May 2015, 4:27 pm
” The distinction between “general” and “specific” was considered by the CJEU in the eBay case and subsequently by the High Court in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v British Telecommunications Plc ([2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch)) in which Arnold J held that an order intended to block access by BT’s subscribers to a particular website involved in copyright infringement did not fall foul of Article 15. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:57 am
This two part post looks at why the Data Protection Act 1998 (the “DPA”), as derived from the Data Protection Directive 1995 (the “DP Directive”) has suddenly, over 25 years since its enactment, become the weapon of choice for reputation managers and in doing so created a thorny new set of problems, particularly for internet intermediaries. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:16 am
In 2005 and 2006, British Sky Broadcasting Group, now Sky plc and Sky IP International, filed a notice of opposition, pleading the likelihood of confusion with its earlier Community word mark SKY, filed in 2003 for identical goods and services. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 6:53 am
When it might cost insurers money – appears to be the answer in view of the arguments put forward in the case of Dalton v British Telecom which was decided in the High Court last week.Dalton & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc [2015] EWHC 616 (QB) (13 March 2015)This was not simply an academic argument. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 10:48 pm
Judgment has now been given by Mr Justice Phillips in Dalton v British Telecommunications plc ruling that noise induced hearing … Continue reading → [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
The exception to this rule is where the defect arises in the demised premises themselves, in which case liability arises only when the landlord “has information about the existence of the defect such as would put a reasonable landlord on inquiry as to whether works of repair are needed and he has failed to carry out the necessary works with reasonable expedition thereafter” (British Telecommunications plc v Sun Life Assurance Society plc [1996] Ch 69).… [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 11:47 am
In Adaptive Spectrum and Signal Alignment Inc v British Telecommunications Plc [2013] EWHC 3768 (Pat) (3 Dec 2013) the claimant sued the defendant telecommunications company for infringing two of its European patents: EP 2,259,495 adaptive DSL margin and band control using historical operational data ("495"); and EP 1,869,790 DSL state and line profile control ("790"). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
ABSTRACT: In 2005, Ofcom, then telecommunications regulator in the United Kingdom, implemented functional separation of British Telecom plc (BT), separating its wholesale and retail services. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:51 am
British Telecommunications plc & Ors v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 133 The Court refused the application by British Sky Broadcasting Ltd to appeal the Court of Appeal’s ruling that they should make their core premium sports channels available to competitors’ platforms at a fixed price set by Ofcom. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:14 am
Comment This is an important decision in a field which is becoming an increasingly prominent battleground between BT and other telecommunications operators in a range of sectors. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:30 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 42 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: British Telecommunication plc v Telefonica O2 Ltd & Ors [2014] UKSC 42 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am
However, on Wednesday 9 July 2014, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: British Telecommunication Plc v Telefonica 02 UK Ltd & Ors and Agricultural Sector (Wales) Bill – Reference by the Attorney General. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 1:31 pm
(The reason for this last agreement being that the wording of the landlord’s repairing obligation was ‘to keep in repair’ and therefore, as per British Telecommunications plc v Sun Life Assurance Society plc [1996] Ch 69 (CA), the repairing liability for retained parts arose immediately a defect occurred, not once the landlord was on notice of the defect.) [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
British Telecommunication Plc v Telefonica 02 UK Limited and Ors, heard 3 – 4 February 2014. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am
British Telecommunication Plc v Telefonica 02 UK Limited and Ors, heard 3 – 4 February 2014. [read post]
