Search for: "Brooks v April" Results 61 - 80 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2008, 10:05 am
Brooks, Judge Representing Appellant (Plaintiffs): Richard V. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday (Day 76), the defence case of Rebekah Brooks’ former PA, Cheryl Carter, began. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 8:47 am by INFORRM
Global BC v The Queen [2010] BCCA 169 is an interesting case concerning media access to evidence in criminal trials. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 2:11 pm
Read more… or Read more right here… » Here are the first set of cases: Davies v East, January 8, 1788 Ormond v Payne, July 9, 1789 The King v Dodd, May 30, 1808 R v Burdett, November 28, 1820 Collins v Godefroy, January 18, 1831 Vaughan v Menlove, August 2, 1836 Priestly v Fowler, January 17, 1837 Attwood v Small, March 27, 1838 M'Kinnell v Robinson, May 1, 1838 … [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The defence case in the phone hacking trial begins at the Old Bailey on Wednesday 19 February 2014 with the case of Rebekah Brooks. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
April 12, 2007): In this case it is clear that there was a substantial basis to conclude that evidence of criminal activity would be found at 7608 Scenic Brook Drive. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
Justice Gorsuch, has described that method, articulated in the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See e.g., Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006] [speculation on future events insufficient to establish causation in malpractice action]; John P. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
The world’s media were out in force for the appearance of Mrs Brooks. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:01 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Reflecting on the Supreme Court’s April 24 decision in Jesner v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The First Department has held that to establish prox.in1atc cause on a claim for legal malpractice, the “plaintiff must demonstrate that but for the attorney’s negligence, [they] would have prevailed in the underlying mailer or would not have sustained any ascertainable damages” (Brooks v, Lewin, 21AD3d 73 1, 734 [1st Dept 2005]). [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
: RealNetworks, Mattel and Hasbro copy the infringer by creating online Scrabble: (IP ThinkTank), Creative Commons Statement of Intent for Attribution-Share Alike Licenses released: (creativecommons.org) Events IP Business Congress – 25-26 June, Amsterdam: (IP Business Congress), INTA annual meeting – 17-21 May, Berlin: (IMPACT), Australia: IPRIA / CELRL / IP Australia: Employees’ IP and the employment relationship – incentives to innovate… [read post]