Search for: "Brooks v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
Northeastern University School of Law Professor Brook K. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
United States and Gould v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:45 am
A note to readers: business back at Brookings will keep your correspondent away from Fort Meade, and from observing, almost live and via CCTV broadcast, a two-day pre-trial hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 11:27 am
Brooks, Slip Copy, 2008 WL 2275486 (W.D. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 4:38 am
Tammany Parish Government v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:28 am
Brooks et al v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
Brooks, et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm
Rossum, The Supreme Court and Tribal Gaming: California v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:12 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
Per Brooks-Ngwenya v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" This amendment established the doctrine of "sovereign immunity" of States and was adopted in response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm
In doing so, the Federal Circuit established broad standing for private individuals seeking to pursue qui tam actions for false patent marking on behalf of the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:52 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
(One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
Brooks, 60 M.J. 495 (C.A.A.F. 2005); United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Evans to United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:51 am
Brooks’ False Claims Act wins are Mason v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
II,§ 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
