Search for: "Broome v. Broome"
Results 61 - 80
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2017, 11:26 am
All of these institutions concluded that the blackberry bushes, broom plants, other weedy vegetation, abundant trash and illegally dumped material on these lots were better characterized as "a blight, a habitat for rats and vermin, and an attractive [pun intended, I presume] nuisance. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:25 am
In Doyle v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 11:42 am
Sguanci, an off-duty supervisory Broome County security officer was involved in some pranks or "practical jokes" carried out on County property involving fellow security officers then on duty [Wguanci v Commissioner of Public Works, Broome County, 158 A.D.2d 788] [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:17 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 7:04 am
17 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Co. in Rehabilitation v Big Apple Roofing Co., Inc., 50 AD3d 1239, 1239-1240 [2008]; Root v Brotmann, 41 AD3d 247, 247 [2007]; Gissen v Boy Scouts of Am., 26 AD3d at 290-291), his cross motion to retain venue in Broome County should have been denied. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
Jennings v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:20 am
Green v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:43 am
This time, it's Orthodox v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
Not being familiar with the rules not a valid excuse for failure to follow procedures Broome Co. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 2:41 am
Additional Resources: Suarez v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:38 am
Bean v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:11 am
State of Minnesota v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
Cooey v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Areas include parts of Brooklyn and Queens and parts of Broome, Orange and Rockland Counties. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:33 am
Supreme Court, Broome County, granted Theodora Q. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:33 am
Supreme Court, Broome County, granted Theodora Q. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Although the United States Supreme Court ruled in Baze v. [read post]
