Search for: "Brown v. Board of State Fair Managers" Results 61 - 80 of 172
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm by Guest Author
“Special meetings” are meetings called by the Board President or majority of the legislative body to discuss only discrete items on the agenda under the Brown Act’s notice requirements for special meetings. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 1:59 pm by Guest Author
“Special meetings” are meetings called by the Board President or majority of the legislative body to discuss only discrete items on the agenda under the Brown Act’s notice requirements for special meetings. [read post]
Affirming the trial court, the First District Court of Appeal held that the petitioners failed to provide substantial evidence of a fair argument of a reasonable possibility of a significant environmental effect as a result of the stated unusual circumstance. [read post]
Affirming the trial court, the First District Court of Appeal held that the petitioners failed to provide substantial evidence of a fair argument of a reasonable possibility of a significant environmental effect as a result of the stated unusual circumstance. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
O’Connor v Bar Standards Board, heard 4 Oct 2017. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 3:15 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) has scheduled nine (9) oral hearings for the month of September 2017. [read post]
AB 543 would authorize, under a voluntary written agreement, an employer that doesn’t charge a resident apartment manager monthly rent, to apply up to one-half of the fair market rental value of the apartment to meet minimum wage obligations to the apartment manager. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am by Ronald Collins
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer… [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
However, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted on references A, B, and C against claim 10. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
  Instead, the 2012 MOU was akin to the “term sheet” in Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]