Search for: "Brown v. Carter" Results 61 - 80 of 269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Alabama Department of Revenue, et al., with Carter G. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 10:28 am
Brown, 941 F.2d 1300, 1302 (5th Cir. 1991). [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:21 am by emagraken
Carter, 2004 BCSC 866…. [52]         Ms. [read post]
23 May 2013, 7:21 am by emagraken
Carter, 2004 BCSC 866…. [52]         Ms. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by Ted Frank
[CJAC; Legal Newsline; Mercury News; Steele; Santa Clara v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 10:44 am by INFORRM
The claimant is represented by Desmond Browne QC and Victoria Jolliffe, instructed by Carter-Ruck. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The legal malpractice case is first dismissed:  “Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . . . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept… [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Brown, 2022 SCC 18 [2] At common law, automatism is “a state of impaired consciousness, rather than unconsciousness, in which an individual, though capable of action, has no voluntary control over that action” (R. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:01 am by Benjamin Bissell
Last year, Carter wrote an article in DefenseOne that outlined his plans for the Pentagon, which you can find here. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
District Court Judge Gregory Frost granted Carter a stay of execution while Cooey v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept 1997]). [read post]