Search for: "Brown v. Internal Revenue Office" Results 61 - 80 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
HarvardLaw74 Backup file made by TweetBackup 2012-08-02 15:24:182012-08-02 14:03:54 HarvardLaw74: RT @KeithDarce: Private financing of digital health tripled in 1st half of 2012 to $499B http://t.co/cGPJP6wI via HealthTechZone #startups [Non Social media driven Healthcare startups have the immediate opportunity to achieve solid revenues in an expanding domestic and international market] http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2308613732094730262012-08-02 00:22:42 HarvardLaw74:… [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Shannon O'Hare
Some have set up offices in different jurisdictions: Eaton Vance, Standard Life Aberdeen, and Legal & General have all set up offices in Dublin. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
At the Solicitor General’s request, the Court appears to be holding Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
SM (Algeria) v Entry Clearance Officer UK Visa Section, heard 23 Mar 2017. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
But Vasquez has established that the state court violated his Confrontation Clause right to impeach Demond Brown's credibility with his criminal record. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm by Blog Editorial
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
The bankruptcy trustee attempted to reverse a 2014 payment that the company had made of approximately $145,000 to the Internal Revenue Service to cover the personal tax debts of two company officials. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
US, No. 06-1509 I"n the context of sections of the Internal Revenue Code that set the conditions for treating certain corporate distributions as returns of capital, nontaxable to the recipient, a distributee accused of criminal tax evasion may claim return-of-capital treatment without producing evidence that either he or the corporation intended a return of capital when the distribution occurred. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
"  To support this, he relied on Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Marek, No. 072437 Conviction for corruptly endeavoring to obstruct or impede the due administration of the Internal Revenue Code is affirmed where: 1) the inference that defendant knew about the audit was supported by the record; and 2) viewed in the light most favorable to the government, defendant's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence to support a finding that defendant was guilty of the offense. . [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:11 am by Shannon O'Hare
SPECIAL THANKS We appreciate the assistance of Emmanuelle Naulais at Brown Rudnick, Paris Office with the following discussion on French, law, regulation and practice. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Anthony B. Cavender
The DC Court also noted that the NLRB was not entitled to Chevron deference when it was interpreting the FVRA and neither was the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel, whose 1999 interpretation of the 1998 statue coincided with the NLRB ’s views. [read post]