Search for: "Brown v. Internal Revenue Office" Results 61 - 80 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm by Mark Walsh
Dressed in a chocolate-brown pantsuit, Burwell soon made her way to the front row, center bench, of the public gallery to take in the arguments over the Internal Revenue Service regulation. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
In denying relief, Acting Surrogate Brown relied upon section 3740 of the 1939 Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
At the same time, the total annual revenue of Chinese lawyers was reportedly 47 billion [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Faced with these candid admissions, this Court believes it appropriate to forward a copy of this decision and order to the United States Internal Revenue Service for their review. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:50 am by Frances Rogers
 See our previous articles here and here Internal Revenue Code provisions on payroll withholdings for Social Security, unemployment insurance, and Medicare. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:23 am by Jon Gelman
The signatories also welcome a strong role for the International Labour Organization (ILO),  through the Bangladesh office as well as through international programmes, to ensure that both  the National Action Plan, and the programme foreseen by the signatories of this Agreement, get  implemented. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am by Rob Robinson
  http://bit.ly/RL2WKj (Ralph Losey) Reports and Resources2012 Deloitte-NASCIO Cybersecurity Study - http://bit.ly/Rzd4pn (Deloitte) Designing, Implementing, Maintaining and Releasing Legal Holds (PDF) http://bit.ly/RQ41Ao (Browning Marean, Kathy Owen, Bradley Smyer) Discovery about Discovery:  Sampling Practice and Resolution of Discovery Disputes (PDF) - http://bit.ly/RB0nO8 (Nick Landsman) Magic Quadrant for Enterprise… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
HarvardLaw74 Backup file made by TweetBackup 2012-08-02 15:24:182012-08-02 14:03:54 HarvardLaw74: RT @KeithDarce: Private financing of digital health tripled in 1st half of 2012 to $499B http://t.co/cGPJP6wI via HealthTechZone #startups [Non Social media driven Healthcare startups have the immediate opportunity to achieve solid revenues in an expanding domestic and international market] http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2308613732094730262012-08-02 00:22:42 HarvardLaw74:… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Roy Ginsburg
Spencer International Press, Inc., (n.12) two competitors in the sale of encyclopedias and other reference books had a “no switching” agreement. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, would be sending a letter of recommendation for Rost as well as several other candidates for the post. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 6:16 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (acting by its joint liquidators) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office, heard 23 – 25 January 2012. [read post]